Khamenei of Iran denounces the negotiations with us but seems to leave the door Ajar

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Iranian supreme leader, said that negotiations with the United States were “not very wise, not very intelligent and not honorable”, a few days after President Trump said he was willing to revive the negotiations with Tehran.

But Mr. Khamenei stopped ordering the Iranian government, who for months has sent signals that is interested in negotiations, not to commit himself to Washington. And although Mr. Khamenei made an unusual gesture last year of opening at the interviews, he generally took a publicly hostile position against Washington, even if allowing Iranian officials silently to negotiate.

In Friday’s comments, Khamenei claimed that the previous experiences of Iran who negotiated with the United States have shown that Washington could easily give up the agreements. Under the previous administration of Mr. Trump, the United States unilaterally retired from a nuclear agreement on the basis of which Iran would have limited its enrichment and accumulation of uranium in exchange for sanctions.

“Negotiating with America will not solve any problems. The test? Experience, “said Khamenei, according to the Iranian state press agency, Irna, who said that his comments arrived during a meeting with commanders and staff of the Iranian armed forces.

“The same person who is now in office has torn the agreement,” said Khamenei. “You must not negotiate with a government like this. Negotiating is not wise, not very intelligent, not honorable. “

Ali Vaez, director of the Iranian project of the International Crisis Group, said on social media that the comments could simply be “in line” with the previous public approach of Khamenei. In 2011, he publicly opposed the negotiations with the Obama administration, even if he authorized negotiators to secretly meet with the US officials in Oman.

“If a real ban is once again his stubbornness that makes him the antagonist in his own story.” Mr. Vaez said.

The leader’s comments seemed to underestimate the gestures of last week by the Iranian reformist president, Masoud Pezeshkian, who told the NBC News that he was ready to negotiate with the United States, provided that “respect our honor and wisdom and are conducted on an equal level “.

Tehran feels weakened by his decreasing influence in the Middle East-even through the successful decimation of Israel of his Lebanese partner, Hezbollah, and by the rebellious expulsion of his long-standing ally in Syria, President Bashar al-Axad-Che raised concern that it would have been even more inclined to turn to nuclear levels of weapons.

The US officials warned at the beginning of this week who believe that Iran was working to develop a faster and more rough approach for the development of an atomic bomb.

In his comments on Friday, Mr. Khamenei swept away the concerns about the fact that the refusal of the interviews would have further damaged the Iran economy, claiming that Iran must find domestic responses to the crisis.

“What solves these problems is a domestic element,” he said.

At the beginning of this week, Mr. Trump himself seemed to indicate that he was trying to relaunch the negotiations, even if he signed an executive order that would return a “maximum pressure” policy that would have tried to block Iranian oil exports, one Critical source of revenue for the country.

“This I am torn by,” he told journalists as he signed the order. “Everyone wants me to sign it. I will do it, “he said, but added that he was not happy to do it.”

On his social media website, the president this week has promised to negotiate an “verified nuclear peace agreement”, similar to the one that has torpedoed in its previous administration. He said he wanted to start working for an agreement “immediately”.

“I want Iran to be a large and successful country, but that he cannot have a nuclear weapon,” he wrote.

But Mr. Trump also threatened this week that he would “delete” Iran if his killers killed him.

On Friday the observations of Mr. Khamenei included an apparent response to that threat. “If they threaten us, we will threaten them,” he said. “If they operate that threat, we will attract ours. If they violate the safety of our nation, we will violate their security. “

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *